SuperFogeys

For fans of all ages who love Superheroes like Spiderman, Superman or even Batman.
RSS
  • Home
  • Chapters
  • Characters
  • Links
  • Creator Bios
  • Fan Art
  • Store

Podcast! Brock and Marc talk “Man of Steel” with the Geek League Crew

by Brock Heasley on June 26th, 2013
Posted In: Uncategorized

Hear us now! Geek League of America has a new podcast up and Marc and I were invited to come on the show to talk with Jeff and Shawn Carter and give our thoughts on Man of Steel. Marc and I don’t exactly agree, and no one on the show is as enthused as I am about the film, so it was a unique opportunity to defend my stance on the film and expand on some of the thoughts I’ve written in my two reviews here on superfogeys.com.

I know that many of you disagree with my take as well, some of you vehemently so! I love it. I love the discussion. And you know you wanna hear why Marc was “disappointed” with the movie. In the podcast, we cover everything from the amount of destruction in the film, Superman’s choice at the end, whether the filmmakers “got” Superman and what, exactly, Goyer, Nolan and Snyder did that was different from other takes on Superman that warranted this reboot.

Listen here now!

└ Tags: brock heasley, christopher nolan, david goyer, heroes, jeff carter, man of steel, marc lapierre, podcast, shawn carter, superman, zach snyder

Related Posts ¬

    Jun 18, 2013SPOILER! Man of Steel Review Follow-up: About That Ending…
    May 13, 2015SuperFogeys Issue 4… the One with the BIG Reveal… Now Available at Comixology!
    Feb 5, 2014The Redesigned Soviet Sam and Spy Gal!
    Apr 23, 2012New Interview with Brock on TGT!
    Sep 9, 2014On Brock’s Unemployment Troubles
1 Comment

The Jedi Are Pricks: How Star Wars VII-IX Can Make the Prequels Retroactively Better

by Brock Heasley on June 21st, 2013
Posted In: Uncategorized

Hey, everybody! Guess what? I was just invited to be a regular contributor to the fantastic news and opinion site, Geek League of America. My first piece “The Jedi Are Pricks: How Star Wars VII-IX Can Make the Prequels Retroactively Better” just went up! Here’s a preview:

The upcoming Star Wars sequels present a unique challenge in that they’re not only following up one of the most beloved trilogies of all time, but also one of the most reviled. The Prequels. AKA, the movies you really, really want to like more than you do. But you never will, right?

Maybe. Maybe… not.

What if there actually was a way for Director JJ Abrams and Screenwriter Michael Arndt to embrace the Prequels and, retroactively, make them better? They kind of have to do the former. Like it or not, Episodes I-III are part of the story. A trilogy that caps a trilogy of trilogies has got to acknowledge its roots in some way to be complete. Otherwise, it will be as empty as, well, the Prequels.

But how do you make something that’s done and complete, better? Simple, you reframe it. You present insight that gives new meaning to what came before and changes how you look at it forevermore.

And it’s not even hard. The Prequels have been set up for this from the beginning and it’s all due to one, simple, undeniable fact: the Jedi are pricks.

Read the full piece over at Geek League of America right here! And while you’re there, check out the site. It’s a good one.

└ Tags: episode vii, geek league of america, george lucas, jj abrams, prequels, sequels, star wars

Related Posts ¬

    Oct 31, 2011MY HALLOWEEN COSTUME
    Jun 18, 2013SPOILER! Man of Steel Review Follow-up: About That Ending…
    Feb 6, 2012Brock and Marc do Tall Tale Radio!
    Oct 13, 2011WATCHING STAR WARS WITH ELORA, Part Two
    Sep 20, 2011PLOTTING A SERIAL WEBCOMIC, PART 6 – “The Conclusion”
3 Comments

SPOILER! Man of Steel Review Follow-up: About That Ending…

by Brock Heasley on June 18th, 2013
Posted In: Uncategorized

After I wrote my review for Man of Steel, the rest of the world got a chance to see the movie and reaction has been… mixed. Some, like me, are crazy about the movie. Other can’t believe they’re actually calling that guy in the tights “Superman.” This is mostly due to the ending of the film, so let’s talk about it. MASSIVE SPOILERS below. Turn back now if you haven’t seen the movie, I mean it.

Ready?

Okay, first of all, I’m taking a lot of my thoughts here from a comment I left on Jeff Carter’s Man of Steel review over at Geek League of America. Go on over there is see Jeff’s opposing viewpoint and the following in its original content. Jeff’s a great writer, so it’s a good read!

There’s no question that the moment when Superman snaps Zod’s neck is a shocking one. It was a jarring moment and my reaction to it initially was the same as many others–Superman WOULD NOT do that!

But, actually, he would. Man of Steel tries to present to us a real world that Superman can exist in. A Superman who exists in that world–not a four color one where a writer’s imagination trumps all evil in a way that would make Pollyanna scream with joy and vindication–would do what he did. If he hadn’t, the movie would have betrayed its premise. I believe that that Superman will do everything in his power to not kill, but I think it’s absolutely correct and even righteous that he will kill if he has to. It’s extremely righteous.

Let me be clear about something: killing is evil, but the act of killing is not always evil. “Superheroes don’t kill” is an old trope and a comforting one (I make a big deal out of it in SuperFogeys more than once), but it absolutely does not carry over to anything resembling the real world. Killing, in defense of others and freedom, is not wrong and is often, sadly, necessary. Zod’s life was not more valuable than that family and all the people of Metropolis. Superman didn’t have a choice because the alternative–letting Zod do his thing–was the greater evil.

A lot of people are saying the brutal killing of Zod does not allow the movie to end triumphantly and that instead there’s a darkness that hangs over it. I don’t see it that way. Not at all. I think this may come down to individual preference and perspective, but I simply don’t understand light without the dark.

Superman’s killing of Zod is my favorite moment of the movie. Not because of what he does, but because of how he reacts. Instantly, he mourns. And it’s a mourning with a mixture of what he had to do–kill–and that fact that he had to kill Zod, leaving Superman all alone. The whole movie was about Clark wanting to find out about his heritage. And then he destroys that heritage.

Where is the triumph in that? For me, it’s in the why he did it. He made that sacrifice for us–for the people of Earth. That’s what makes him a hero. He absolutely did not want to do it, but he did it anyway. He’s a Christ figure, like it or not. Christ sacrificed himself on the cross in order to triumph over death for the rest of us. In the movie, Superman sacrificed much so that the people of Earth might live. No matter how dark the act, that, to me, is incredibly triumphant. Self-sacrifice for the greater good. Earth lives. Everybody gets to go home.

Now, I hope we see more of the consequence of the act. Superman should only ever take a measure so extreme when there’s no other choice (the writers of the comic understand this–he’s killed four beings in the course of his history), but it should shake him pretty terribly. Man of Steel showed us this in brief, but I think there’s room in a sequel for him to deal with this a little more. I hope he does, but, ultimately, he should feel good about what he did.

Because he did the right thing.

└ Tags: ending, geek league of america, jeff carter, man of steel, movie review, review, spoiler, superman, zach snyder, zod

Related Posts ¬

    Jul 27, 2011COWBOYS AND ALIENS REVIEW
    Jun 26, 2013Podcast! Brock and Marc talk “Man of Steel” with the Geek League Crew
    May 7, 2012Movie Review: THE AVENGERS
    Jun 21, 2013The Jedi Are Pricks: How Star Wars VII-IX Can Make the Prequels Retroactively Better
    Sep 7, 2011Guest Blog: “FANTERVIEW” BY BENJAMIN KISSELL
5 Comments

Man of Steel Review: You Will Believe Kevin Costner Can Parent

by Brock Heasley on June 14th, 2013
Posted In: Uncategorized

I’m going to do what I can to keep this review spoiler-free, but, obviously, if you want to know absolutely nothing going in, turn back now.

Superman is my favorite. More than Batman, Spider-Man, Captain America or Tom Strong, Superman is my go-to superhero. The sad thing about being a Superman fan is that he’s rarely done right. He’s a notoriously difficult character to write and many a great storyteller has stumbled in their attempts to chronicle his adventures. The difficulty is pretty simple: great Superman stories cannot be rooted in plot. He can do pretty much anything and solve just about any problem. Superman is a walking deus ex machina, so the plot is almost beside the point.

What you’re left with, then, is character. It’s too easy to define Superman solely by what he can do, but that’s all surface stuff. Superman is just as much about what he won’t do. What, in his mind, he can’t do. It’s who the guy is underneath that fascinates us; that moral center that allows him to make the hard choices and resist temptations that might more easily beset the rest of us.

So, how does Man of Steel tackle this issue?

Brilliantly.

This is the Superman movie worthy of the character from the first minute to the last. That’s an important distinction. There is much greatness in Superman: The Movie and Superman II, but they’re not all great. Man of Steel is pretty much all great. It gets Superman and it gets what we want to see from a guy who can level mountains with one punch.

The movie begins on Krypton with a scene that, straight off, evokes The Nativity. Director Zach Snyder and Writer David Goyer do not shy away from the Christ allegory that is inherently a part of the mythology of Superman*. Superman is born, his is a special birth, a powerful man wants him dead, the baby is sent away, and then it’s off to the races. I’m selling the sequence short a little (Krypton has been reimagined in great detail–much of it taken from the many versions of Krypton seen in the comics through the years), but this is all prologue and frames up the central conflict between General Zod (Michael Shannon) and Superman perfectly.

*I realize that Superman was created by two Jewish kids and that many see him as a Moses figure, but in the Christian faith Moses is a type of Christ meant to serve as an example of what to look forward to, so it all works out.

I’m confused by early reviews that claim Zod’s motivation is unclear. I don’t think it could be more clear. Zod himself spells it out in the film’s final moments with some dialogue that was, admittedly, a little on-the-nose. Zod wants to save whatever he can of what’s left of Krypton (I’m being vague on purpose), which is an admirable goal. It’s how he wants to go about it that’s the problem, and that’s what forces Superman to make some hard decisions.

Someone asked me last night if it ends well. Too many superhero movies these days have endings that amount to little more than punching and cleaning up. These too-long sequences take character out of the story and assume all we want are visceral thrills. Man of Steel certainly has its share of thrilling, maybe-a-touch-too-long action sequences, but it grounds them in character in a way that holds our interest and makes them much more than pure spectacle. I don’t think it’s revealing too much to say that, for me, the best moment of the movie–and the one in which I decided the film is truly great–comes at the very end. Something happens that I didn’t see coming and… I admit it, I was moved. I don’t usually get teary at superhero movies, but this one did a little number on me.

My ticket to the pre-midnight show. Big thanks to my buddy Alan Pules for picking up tickets for me and Erin.

Henry Cavill as Superman acquits himself incredibly well. As my wife (not a comic book fan) said, he plays Superman with the same qualities Christopher Reeve brought to the role–an unfailing human decency, a mixture of kindness and strength that I have to think is incredibly difficult to pull off. Mind you, Cavill is not doing a Reeve impression. He makes the the role his own in a big, big way.

The other key aspect of Superman’s character that the movie addresses over and over again (to great effect) is that Superman is meant to inspire. The weight of that is almost too much to bear for the young Clark Kent (the film very well could have been retitled Superman Begins), but he gradually comes to an acceptance of this responsibility and fully embraces it. There’s a great moment near the end when Superman’s heroic, godlike fight against evil is juxtaposed with the very human Perry White’s (Laurence Fishburne) attempts to rescue a co-worker from rubble and both actions feel equally as important. Superman’s deeds are meant to do much more than solve immediate problems. He lights the way.

I read recently that Batman is defined by his lack of parents and Superman by his surplus of parents (can’t remember where I read that, sorry). I think that’s astoundingly astute. Still, I was quite surprised by how much all those parents are involved in the story. They play a big, big part all the way through, past the point where you think they’re out of the picture. The story is told largely out of sequence, with frequent flashbacks to Clark Kent’s youth and his relationship with his fathers in particular. Kevin Costner is basically the movie’s MVP and he has a moment about midway through that will haunt you as you leave the theater. Russell Crowe brings a quiet, butt-kicking dignity to Jor-El that it just a pleasure to watch. This is the show My Two Dads should have been.

Lois Lane (Amy Adams) has been completely reconfigured and rethought for this version of the Superman mythology. She’s the same character, but her relationship to Superman and Clark Kent and the dynamic between the three of them has been altered in a way that not only makes a whole lot of sense, but that is also exciting for future movies. (And there will be sequels. The first one has already been greenlit.)

There’s so much more I could say, but not without getting into big spoiler territory. Going in, I’d read ecstatic-to-middling reviews of the film. It’s definitely not a perfect film–there are some odd pacing issues here and there and I wish Superman were a little more conscious of innocent bystanders–but it worked like gangbusters for me.

I look forward to seeing what comes next. Man of Steel ends on perhaps the most perfect exchange of dialogue that I’ve seen in quite a while. (I can’t believe no one else ever thought of it before.) And that line of dialogue holds within it a promise of great things in the future. I can’t wait.

└ Tags: amy adams, batman, comic books, david goyer, dc comics, henry cavill, kevin costner, krypton, man of steel, man of steel review, michael shannon, review, superheroes, superman, warner bros., zach snyder, zod

Related Posts ¬

    Jun 18, 2013SPOILER! Man of Steel Review Follow-up: About That Ending…
    Sep 7, 2011Guest Blog: “FANTERVIEW” BY BENJAMIN KISSELL
    Jun 26, 2013Podcast! Brock and Marc talk “Man of Steel” with the Geek League Crew
7 Comments

Little Person Among Media Giants

by Brock Heasley on June 13th, 2013
Posted In: Uncategorized

Wanna get a signed copy of the out-of-print SuperFogeys Vol. 1? Keep reading.

SuperFan and Podcaster Extraordinaire Kurtis Sasso (TGT Media) is branching out to work on his first film–a documentary entitled Little Person Among Media Giants. Kurt is one of the good ones, so you best pay attention. From his summary:

This documentary follows an independent interviewer struggling to survive in this mass media world, working hard to not only find his place in the world, but to be recognized as well.

To do this he needs to get one great interview. The journey evolves by the not only personal stories being told, but also through other interviewees on their own successes and failures and how they are attempting to make a name for themselves.

Kurt can’t make this film without your help. To fund his movie he’s started an IndieGoGo campaign filled with all kinds of great rewards for those who contribute. Among them is a signed copy of the out-of-print SuperFogeys Vol. 1! Some of you have been asking me lately about how you can get SF in print, and right now this is the ONLY way. For $40, you’ll not only get the signed book but a DVD of the completed film and your name in the credits.

Sound like a good deal to you? Head on over to the campaign page to find out more.

└ Tags: documentary, film, indiegogo, kurtis sasso, little person among media giants, superfogeys vol.1, tgt media

Related Posts ¬

    Jan 21, 2014Brock Talks “One Year Later” with Kurt Sasso from TGT!
    Apr 23, 2012New Interview with Brock on TGT!
26 Comments
  • Page 12 of 35
  • « First
  • «
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • »
  • Last »

OUR WORLDS

  • Pinkerton
  • The SuperFogeys
  • Legend of Bill

quicklinks

  • Home
  • Store
  • Downloads
  • Info
  • faqs
  • th3rdworld.com
WEBCOMICS ONLINE by TH3RD WORLD STUDIOS, LLC.
© 2025 Th3rd World Studios. All Rights Reserved.